Philippine Bar review · Topic

Aberratio Ictus; Error In Personae; Praeter Intentionem

Page 2 of practice questions on Aberratio Ictus; Error In Personae; Praeter Intentionem in Criminal Liability. Browse published questions and explore related…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Article49(3)’s stated exception, in what period is the higher penalty for the attempt or frustrated offense impos…
  2. The facts are stipulated to fall under Article49(2), with a lower penalty for the actual felony and no paragraph3 or ot…
  3. The acts in a proper Article49 case also constitute an attempted offense carrying a higher penalty than the lower actua…
  4. A case is properly governed by Article49. The committed felony has a lower penalty, but the same established acts const…
  5. Two cases are expressly within Article49. In CaseA paragraph2 applies without exception. In CaseB the acts also establi…
  6. A case properly falls under Article49(2), with no paragraph3 or other exception. State the penalty rule where the actua…
  7. Explain Article49(3)’s exception where the same established acts also constitute a higher-penalty attempted or frustrat…
  8. Compare two proper Article49 cases: one has only the lower actual-felony rule, while the other also satisfies the highe…