Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Aberratio Ictus; Error In Personae; Praeter Intentionem

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

Two cases are expressly within Article49. In CaseA paragraph2 applies without exception. In CaseB the acts also establish a higher-penalty attempt satisfying paragraph3. A party insists both must receive the lower actual-felony penalty merely because the actual harm was less than intended. What distinction is required?
  1. Ignore paragraph3 in both cases
  2. Apply paragraph2 in A and the express higher-attempt exception in B
  3. Apply acquittal in both cases
  4. Treat every mistake of identity as the same sentencing formula
  5. Use only the offender’s later description of intent

Legal references

  • Revised Penal Code, Articles3-4 and49, as applicable: https://lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act1930/act_3815_1930.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.