Philippine Bar review · Topic

Aberratio Ictus; Error In Personae; Praeter Intentionem

Explore Aberratio Ictus; Error In Personae; Praeter Intentionem in Criminal Liability for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is aberratio ictus?
  2. What is error in personae?
  3. What does praeter intentionem concern?
  4. An attacker deliberately stabs the person in front of him, believing that person is a rival. The person is someone else…
  5. An accused repeatedly directs a deadly weapon at vital areas, causing death, but claims lack of intent to commit so gra…
  6. A single criminal act directed at one target also harms another. The proved act constitutes two grave or less grave fel…
  7. In a case properly governed by Article 49(1), the felony actually committed carries a higher penalty than the offense i…
  8. Distinguish aberratio ictus, error in personae and praeter intentionem using a brief example of each.
  9. Explain why a stray-blow situation does not automatically call for Article 49. Address the conditional role of Article …
  10. An unlawful assault causes a graver injury than claimed to have been intended. Explain the relationship between Article…
  11. In a case properly governed by Article49(2), the committed felony has the lower penalty than the intended offense. Whic…
  12. What Article49 paragraph supplies the stated higher attempted-or-frustrated-offense exception to paragraph2?