Philippine Bar review · Topic

Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175, Ch. II)

Explore Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175, Ch. II) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What conduct is described by illegal access under RA 10175 section 4(a)(1)?
  2. After Disini, how must section 4(c)(3)’s printed prohibition on unsolicited commercial communications be treated?
  3. Under the April 8, 2026 main resolution in Causing, what prescriptive period and starting point apply to cyberlibel?
  4. Without right, Tomas uses technical means to intercept a nonpublic transmission of computer data between two systems. W…
  5. Without right, Dina alters an electronic clearance so it falsely shows government approval, intending that it be accept…
  6. An original author uploads a defamatory post. A reader merely receives it and clicks a reaction without composing or pu…
  7. An allegedly defamatory post was uploaded in 2024. In a 2026 motion to quash, its author relies solely on the upload da…
  8. An investigator wants to charge an original defamatory-post author and a reader who merely reacted to it under identica…
  9. Compare intentional deletion of another’s computer data without right with unauthorized alteration producing inauthenti…
  10. A defendant insists that cyberlibel always prescribes one year after upload, while the prosecutor insists that a specia…
  11. Which RA10175 category centers on interference with the functioning of a computer system without right?
  12. Does computer-related identity theft expressly cover identifying information of a juridical person?