Philippine Bar review · Topic
Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22; AC 12-2000 and 13-2001)
Explore Bouncing Checks Law (BP 22; AC 12-2000 and 13-2001) in SPECIAL PENAL LAWS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which basic combination is required for the first-paragraph BP 22 offense?
- What period does Section 2 give after receiving the required notice of dishonor for the statutory payment or full-payme…
- Where a corporation draws the check, whom does BP 22 specifically identify for liability under its corporate-drawer pro…
- An accused argues that AC 12-2000 and AC 13-2001 decriminalized BP 22 and removed imprisonment from the law. Which is c…
- The drawee bank texts the drawer that a check was dishonored. The payee argues that this bank alert automatically repla…
- A drawer previously supplied an actively used email address in official communications concerning the transaction. The …
- A messenger credibly testifies and swears in an affidavit that he tendered the notice at the drawer's office, where the…
- Explain BP 22's knowledge presumption, the ninety-day presentment condition, and the five-banking-day opportunity after…
- Summarize Carlos's treatment of electronic notice of dishonor. Distinguish primary email service from substituted elect…
- Explain AC 13-2001's clarification of the BP 22 fine preference. What remains within the judge's authority, and does a …
- Does BP22 Section1 separately address a drawer who initially has sufficient funds but fails to maintain coverage within…
- Which period appears in that Section1 maintaining-funds mode?