Philippine Bar review · Topic
Ex Post Facto Law
Explore Ex Post Facto Law in Constitutional Limitations on the Power to Enact Penal Laws for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What central combination characterizes a prohibited ex post facto penal law?
- Which is a classic ex post facto change if applied to prior conduct?
- Does every new procedural law applied in a pending criminal case automatically violate the ex post facto prohibition?
- An act committed in 2024 carried a maximum fine of PHP 1,000. A 2025 statute raises the maximum to PHP 5,000 and expres…
- A statute reallocates pending criminal cases to another competent court while preserving the offense, punishment, burde…
- When an offense was committed, the law required specified corroborating testimony to sustain conviction. A later statut…
- A later penal law reduces the punishment for a felony. An offender who is not a habitual criminal within the Article 22…
- A law enacted after an act was committed makes that formerly innocent act criminal and applies punishment to it. Anothe…
- Distinguish a genuinely procedural transfer of a pending criminal case from a retroactive evidentiary change that permi…
- Explain how Article 22’s favorable-retroactivity rule differs from the ex post facto prohibition. Assume the offender i…
- May a law described as civil still raise ex post facto concerns if in substance it retroactively imposes a penalty for …
- Is retroactively depriving an accused of an already applicable amnesty protection among the ex post facto categories di…