Philippine Bar review · Topic
Likelihood of Confusion (Dominancy Test)
Page 2 of practice questions on Likelihood of Confusion (Dominancy Test) in Trademarks, Service Marks, and Trade Names. Browse published questions and explore…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What does Kolin identify as “bridging the gap” in the likelihood-of-confusion factors? Multiple Choice Easy
- Two competing brand words are spelled differently but sound very similar when spoken. May the analyst reject confusion … Multiple Choice Medium
- A junior user argues that no consumer has yet testified to an actual mistaken purchase, so likelihood of confusion is l… Multiple Choice Medium
- A junior seller uses a dominant feature aurally and visually close to an earlier mark on goods plausibly linked by dist… Multiple Choice Hard
- An analyst recognizes a junior mark’s dominant resemblance to a strong earlier mark but ends the inquiry because the ju… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain why differently spelled marks can still require aural comparison, and identify what the dominancy analysis seek… Essay Hard
- A claimant has no testimony of a completed mistaken purchase but offers evidence of a strong mark, close dominant resem… Essay Hard
- Discuss buyer sophistication and potential business expansion in a dispute involving related but nonidentical goods wit… Essay Hard