Practice question
A claimant has no testimony of a completed mistaken purchase but offers evidence of a strong mark, close dominant resemblance and related markets. Is the absence of actual-confusion testimony automatically fatal?
Legal references
- Kolin Electronics Co., Inc. v. Kolin Philippines International, Inc., G.R. No. 228165, February 9, 2021, en banc main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/feb2021/gr_228165_2021.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.