Philippine Bar review · Topic
Double Recovery
Explore Double Recovery in Defenses and Other Grounds Affecting Liability for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What does Article 2177 say about quasi-delict responsibility and civil liability arising from penal negligence?
- Does Rule 111 section 3 allow double damages merely because an independent civil action proceeds separately from a crim…
- What is the basic inquiry when double recovery is alleged?
- A liable defendant has fully paid ₱500,000 specifically compensating one proved property loss. The victim seeks another…
- A defendant pays ₱200,000 toward an established ₱800,000 compensatory obligation for the same loss. In a proper remaini…
- A claimant requests proved medical expenses and a separately justified moral-damages award after one tort. The defendan…
- A civil award accompanying a criminal case has already been fully satisfied for the victim’s specified repair cost. In …
- Explain Article 2177’s simultaneous recognition of separate civil responsibilities and prohibition of double recovery.
- An established compensatory obligation has been partly paid. Explain why the payment should be credited without assumin…
- Why does an award of actual medical expenses and a separately justified moral-damages amount not automatically violate …
- In Fernando, does the availability of distinct estafa and BP22 proceedings authorize collecting the identical civil los…
- Does a defendant’s criminal fine paid to the State necessarily compensate the victim’s private pecuniary loss?