Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Double Recovery

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

What does Article 2177 say about quasi-delict responsibility and civil liability arising from penal negligence?
  1. They are always the same claim for every purpose.
  2. They can never concern the same event.
  3. Every successful claimant must recover twice.
  4. They are separate and distinct, but damages may not be recovered twice for the same act or omission.
  5. The victim must abandon every civil right.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1949/ra_386_1949.html — Civil Code, articles 2177 and2199.
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html — Rules of Court, Rule 111 section 3.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_255180_2024.html — Fernando, Jr. v People, GR 255180, January 31 2024, main resolution: no double recovery for the same act or omission.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.