Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Quo Warranto (Rule 66)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

An employee seeks a private quo warranto action solely to remove an official but admits no claim to that office. Is Section5 satisfied?
  1. Yes, personal displeasure suffices
  2. Yes, every taxpayer automatically satisfies Section5
  3. Yes, a petition caption supplies the missing right
  4. No; the employee’s own entitlement is required for that private route
  5. No governmental action can ever address usurpation

Legal references

  • Rule66 Sections1–5: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.