Philippine Bar review · Topic

Quo Warranto (Rule 66)

Explore Quo Warranto (Rule 66) in SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What does a Rule66 quo warranto action principally test in an office-usurpation case?
  2. Who may bring a private Rule66 action in his or her own name under Section5?
  3. In whose name is the governmental action described in Rule66 Section1 brought?
  4. An employee seeks a private quo warranto action solely to remove an official but admits no claim to that office. Is Sec…
  5. A private claimant proves that the respondent has a defective title but fails to establish the claimant’s own right to …
  6. Two individuals assert competing legal titles to the same public position. One argues that each must file a separate ca…
  7. A claimant timely obtains judgment recognizing a right to an office. It immediately breaks into the office and seizes a…
  8. Distinguish a governmental quo warranto action from the private claimant’s action.
  9. Explain why proof that an incumbent lacks title does not automatically establish a private challenger’s title.
  10. What process governs delivery of official books and papers after a successful claimant is recognized?
  11. Is the governmental Rule 66 petition described in Section 1 verified?
  12. Does Rule 66 Section 1 reach an association acting as a corporation without lawful incorporation or authority?