Practice question
What principally distinguishes forcible entry from unlawful detainer under Rule70?
- Forcible entry involves the specified unlawful deprivation at the start, while unlawful detainer involves withholding after a previously lawful right to possess expires or terminates.
- Both require a final ownership judgment first.
- Both exist only if the defendant admits the claim.
- Unlawful detainer always requires a violent initial entry.
- Forcible entry never concerns possession.
Legal references
- https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2019-rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf — Supreme Court current2019 Rules69–71.
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html — Rules69–71, read with current2019 and2022 expedited-procedure amendments.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/feb2024/gr_268216_2024.html — GR268216, February2024, main decision (2022 expedited rules prospective).
- https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11576_2021.html — RA11576 current monetary and assessed-value jurisdiction, including ejectment exception.
- https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-issues-rules-on-expedited-procedures-in-the-first-level-courts/ — Supreme Court2022 expedited-procedure issuance.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.