Philippine Bar review · Topic

Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70)

Explore Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70) in SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What principally distinguishes forcible entry from unlawful detainer under Rule70?
  2. What is the principal matter adjudicated in ejectment?
  3. Which court level has exclusive original jurisdiction over genuine forcible-entry and unlawful-detainer cases despite a…
  4. A lessee lawfully enters under a lease. After the right to possess is properly terminated and the legally required dema…
  5. A possessor is openly dispossessed by force. The possessor files the proper action within the applicable one-year perio…
  6. In a genuine unlawful-detainer case, the defendant raises ownership. The possession issue cannot be resolved without co…
  7. Two genuine ejectment cases remain for decision in 2026. One was filed in 2019 and the other in 2026. Counsel says the …
  8. Distinguish forcible entry and unlawful detainer by the source of the defendant's possession.
  9. Explain the limited treatment of ownership in an ejectment action.
  10. State the court level and current procedural-regime inquiry for a genuine ejectment action filed in 2026.
  11. For the default Section2 nonpayment-or-condition demand framework involving leased land, what compliance interval is st…
  12. For the same default framework involving a building, what interval does Section2 state?