Philippine Bar review · Topic
Just Compensation
Page 2 of practice questions on Just Compensation in Expropriation (Rule 67; RA 10752, as amended by RA 12289). Browse published questions and explore related…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- After compensation is fixed under Baterna’s stated framework, what legal-interest rate accrues from finality until full…
- For a mathematical illustration only, the court has properly selected a base of PHP 100,000, a five-percent rate and tw…
- An owner declares an exceptionally high value and says amended Section 8 makes that single declaration conclusive. Whic…
- Counsel quotes the CA’s prefinality twelve-percent/six-percent treatment in Baterna as the Supreme Court’s final operat…
- In Baterna’s transmission-line dangling-area setting, the owners demanded full market value but supplied no reliable ac…
- Explain the relationship between taking-date valuation and Baterna’s present-value adjustment.
- Apply the illustrative two-period formula without treating its stipulated five-percent rate as a universal legal rule.
- Explain why Baterna’s consequential-damages discussion must be read in its transmission-line factual setting.