Philippine Bar review · Topic

Just Compensation

Explore Just Compensation in Expropriation (Rule 67; RA 10752, as amended by RA 12289) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Who ultimately determines contested just compensation in expropriation?
  2. What is the relation of a provisional deposit to the final amount due?
  3. Under Rule67 Section4, what ordinary valuation date is stated?
  4. Commissioners use the possession deposit as conclusive final compensation without analyzing the property and governing …
  5. In a covered amended-Section7 case, the owner contests the agency’s proffered amount. Does the amendment assign final v…
  6. An agency took land years before filing suit. The owner seeks today’s price solely because the court is deciding now, w…
  7. A valid final compensation judgment exceeds the covered project’s provisional payment. The agency insists that obtainin…
  8. Explain why judicial valuation is not confined to adopting either party’s preferred figure.
  9. Distinguish the provisional payment and the balance required by a final compensation decision under the amended right-o…
  10. State how Rule67 Section4 addresses valuation timing when taking precedes the complaint.
  11. In Baterna’s delayed-payment setting, does the present-value method simply replace the legally relevant taking-date bas…
  12. What economic loss does Baterna’s present-value adjustment address?