Philippine Bar review · Topic
Provisional Deposit (Rule 135, Secs. 5(g) and 6; Guerrero Estate Dev. Corp. v. Leviste & Guerrero Realty Corp., G.R. No. 253428)
Page 2 of practice questions on Provisional Deposit (Rule 135, Secs. 5(g) and 6; Guerrero Estate Dev. Corp. v. Leviste & Guerrero Realty Corp., G.R. No…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does naming a company as a nominal defendant by itself make it privy to another pair’s contract for deposit purposes?
- A defendant admits the claimant is not its shareholder but attacks the rental deposit as compelled declaration of corpo…
- A company knows two other persons made a revenue-sharing contract, but it did not join or become bound by it. Can knowl…
- A corporation is added as nominal defendant to a suit enforcing a contract between two other persons. The requested ord…
- The main court has the necessary lawful jurisdiction and considers a supported rental-share deposit. A respondent says …
- Explain why a corporate-dividend label did not defeat the particular contractual-rental deposit in Guerrero Estate.
- Explain why nominal joinder and awareness of another contract do not by themselves establish the Lorenzo Shipping jurid…
- Distinguish absence from Rules57–61’s list from absence of lawful auxiliary authority.