Practice question
The main court has the necessary lawful jurisdiction and considers a supported rental-share deposit. A respondent says any deposit order is void merely because the remedy has no separately numbered rule among Rules57–61. Which Guerrero Estate holding answers?
- The remedy’s extraordinary Rule135 basis can support it when its substantive conditions exist
- All unnumbered auxiliary remedies are forbidden
- Rule135 creates jurisdiction over every dispute
- Every requested deposit must be granted
- A deposit order needs no connection to the case
Legal references
- Guerrero Estate v Leviste GR253428 February16,2022 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2022/feb2022/gr_253428_2022.html
- Lorenzo Shipping v Villarin GR175727/178713 March6,2019 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/mar2019/gr_175727_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.