Practice question
Evidence shows a proposed AI tool creates rights-violating harm equivalent to or greater than its benefits. Administrators invoke speed as sufficient justification. Which follows Part II.2?
- Speed always overrides the express harm prohibition.
- The covered person must not use the tool in the stated circumstances.
- Benefits automatically erase rights violations.
- Only a vendor may compare harms.
- Human-rights restrictions disappear after procurement.
Legal references
- AM 25-11-28-SC, February 18, 2026, Governance Framework on Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the Judiciary, Parts I and II as specifically identified: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/101138
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.