Philippine Bar review · Topic

General Principles

Explore General Principles in Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools (Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the Judiciary, AM 25-11-28-SC; Ethical…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under the Judiciary's 2026 AI Governance Framework, how should AI relate to human judgment?
  2. Which general principle in the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026 specifically addresses avoiding algorithmic discrim…
  3. Under the Judiciary's AI Governance Framework, who ultimately bears responsibility for the work and consequences of usi…
  4. A judge proposes to adopt an AI-generated merits result as the primary basis of a ruling without independently forming …
  5. A government agency outsources an AI system and asserts under the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026 that the contrac…
  6. A court office proposes an AI tool that rapidly summarizes sealed records by sending complete identifiable case files t…
  7. A government agency plans an AI eligibility system. Testing shows systematic disadvantage to a linguistic minority. The…
  8. Explain human-centered augmentation and personal accountability under Part II of the Judiciary's February 18, 2026 AI G…
  9. Under section 5 of the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026, discuss the safeguards relevant to a public-service AI pro…
  10. A proposed Judiciary AI tool is efficient but produces unreviewable results, is vulnerable to data leakage, and consume…
  11. Under Part II.2, may a Judiciary AI deployment restrict human rights without legal basis merely because administrators …
  12. Does Part II.2 require respect for human creators’ intellectual property in AI development and datasets?