Philippine Bar review · Topic
General Principles
Explore General Principles in Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools (Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence in the Judiciary, AM 25-11-28-SC; Ethical…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under the Judiciary's 2026 AI Governance Framework, how should AI relate to human judgment?
- Which general principle in the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026 specifically addresses avoiding algorithmic discrim…
- Under the Judiciary's AI Governance Framework, who ultimately bears responsibility for the work and consequences of usi…
- A judge proposes to adopt an AI-generated merits result as the primary basis of a ruling without independently forming …
- A government agency outsources an AI system and asserts under the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026 that the contrac…
- A court office proposes an AI tool that rapidly summarizes sealed records by sending complete identifiable case files t…
- A government agency plans an AI eligibility system. Testing shows systematic disadvantage to a linguistic minority. The…
- Explain human-centered augmentation and personal accountability under Part II of the Judiciary's February 18, 2026 AI G…
- Under section 5 of the issued DICT–CSC JMC No. 003, s. 2026, discuss the safeguards relevant to a public-service AI pro…
- A proposed Judiciary AI tool is efficient but produces unreviewable results, is vulnerable to data leakage, and consume…
- Under Part II.2, may a Judiciary AI deployment restrict human rights without legal basis merely because administrators …
- Does Part II.2 require respect for human creators’ intellectual property in AI development and datasets?