Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Legal Education (See also RA 7662)

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A domestic applicant completed many substantive courses but admittedly omitted the mandatory Legal and Judicial Ethics course. The applicant says a law degree label alone overrides Section3(a)’s course list. Which is correct?
  1. Bar payment automatically cures academic requirements
  2. The degree label eliminates every listed course
  3. Only the school’s popularity matters
  4. An employer may waive the missing course
  5. The specified academic course requirements must be satisfied

Legal references

  • A.M.24-10-05-SC, August12,2025, effective November3,2025, amended Rule138 Sections1–3: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_24-10-05-sc_2025.pdf
  • Republic Act7662, Sections7(c)–(d),8–10, read with Pimentel’s invalidation of Sections7(g)–(h): https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1993/ra_7662_1993.html
  • Pimentel v. Legal Education Board, G.R.230642/242954, November9,2021, MAIN resolution: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/nov2021/gr_230642_2021.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.