Philippine Bar review · Topic
Legal Education (See also RA 7662)
Explore Legal Education (See also RA 7662) in Admission to the Bar (Rule 138, as amended by AM 24-10-05-SC) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which institution was created under RA 7662 to undertake the specified legal-education functions? Multiple Choice Easy
- Under the current Rule 138 Section 3(a), is the mandatory Clinical Legal Education Program included in the academic cou… Multiple Choice Easy
- Did the 2021 Pimentel MR uphold the entire existing LEBMO 7-2016 PhiLSAT scheme? Multiple Choice Easy
- A domestic law graduate relies solely on a personal statement that all academic requirements are complete. What does cu… Multiple Choice Medium
- A Filipino applicant graduated from a foreign law school and submits proof of the completed equivalent law degree and t… Multiple Choice Medium
- A legal-education regulator says Pimentel abolished law schools’ academic freedom and permits it to choose every indivi… Multiple Choice Hard
- A Filipino holding a foreign equivalent law degree applies under current Section 3(b). He provides only his transcript … Multiple Choice Hard
- State the academic proof required of a domestic applicant under amended Section 3(a), distinguishing the completion cer… Essay Medium
- What must a Filipino foreign-law-school graduate establish under amended Section 3(b)? Essay Medium
- Explain the operative 2021 Pimentel disposition concerning the existing PhiLSAT scheme without suggesting that all lega… Essay Medium
- Under RA7662 Section8, may an educational institution operate a law school without the required Board accreditation? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does current Rule138 Section3(a) include Taxation Law among required academic courses? Multiple Choice Easy