Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Legal Education (See also RA 7662)

Explore Legal Education (See also RA 7662) in Admission to the Bar (Rule 138, as amended by AM 24-10-05-SC) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Which institution was created under RA 7662 to undertake the specified legal-education functions? Multiple Choice Easy
  2. Under the current Rule 138 Section 3(a), is the mandatory Clinical Legal Education Program included in the academic cou… Multiple Choice Easy
  3. Did the 2021 Pimentel MR uphold the entire existing LEBMO 7-2016 PhiLSAT scheme? Multiple Choice Easy
  4. A domestic law graduate relies solely on a personal statement that all academic requirements are complete. What does cu… Multiple Choice Medium
  5. A Filipino applicant graduated from a foreign law school and submits proof of the completed equivalent law degree and t… Multiple Choice Medium
  6. A legal-education regulator says Pimentel abolished law schools’ academic freedom and permits it to choose every indivi… Multiple Choice Hard
  7. A Filipino holding a foreign equivalent law degree applies under current Section 3(b). He provides only his transcript … Multiple Choice Hard
  8. State the academic proof required of a domestic applicant under amended Section 3(a), distinguishing the completion cer… Essay Medium
  9. What must a Filipino foreign-law-school graduate establish under amended Section 3(b)? Essay Medium
  10. Explain the operative 2021 Pimentel disposition concerning the existing PhiLSAT scheme without suggesting that all lega… Essay Medium
  11. Under RA7662 Section8, may an educational institution operate a law school without the required Board accreditation? Multiple Choice Easy
  12. Does current Rule138 Section3(a) include Taxation Law among required academic courses? Multiple Choice Easy