Practice question
Explain Maslag’s distinction between jurisdiction actually exercised and jurisdiction a party says should have been exercised.
Legal references
- Maslag v Monzon GR174908 June17,2013 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/jun2013/gr_174908_2013.html
- SEC v Bonifacio, appellate review of SEC quasi-judicial decisions: SEC v Bonifacio GR198425 etal January30,2024 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_198425_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.