Philippine Bar review · Topic
Original and Appellate
Explore Original and Appellate in Classifications for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which best describes original jurisdiction?
- Which best describes appellate jurisdiction?
- Can the same court possess both original and appellate jurisdiction in different classes of cases?
- An RTC hears a properly perfected ordinary appeal from a Municipal Trial Court within its territorial jurisdiction. In …
- A proper petition for mandamus is initiated in the Supreme Court under Article VIII, Section 5(1). How is the Court's j…
- An RTC first resolves a case filed within its statutory original jurisdiction. In a separate proceeding it reviews a pr…
- A litigant files an original petition for certiorari alleging grave abuse of discretion by a lower tribunal. He insists…
- Distinguish original from appellate jurisdiction and explain how an RTC can exercise both. Avoid using the institutiona…
- Why does an original certiorari petition not become an ordinary appeal merely because it challenges a lower tribunal's …
- An RTC decides an ordinary appeal from an MTC on the record and memoranda. A litigant claims this must be original juri…
- For selecting an appeal route under Maslag, what jurisdictional feature of the RTC decision is determinative?
- A Court of Appeals petition for review examines a final SEC quasi-judicial decision under the authorized Rule43 route. …