Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Clear and Convincing Evidence

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Under People v. Akil, who bears the burden of establishing a valid waiver of constitutional rights before a custodial confession, by clear and convincing evidence?
  1. The accused must disprove waiver
  2. The private complainant's relatives alone
  3. The judge's clerk
  4. The prosecution
  5. Any newspaper editor

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/may2021/gr_196359_2021.html — Tan-Andal v. Andal, G.R. No. 196359, May 11, 2021, EN BANC MAIN decision (clear and convincing evidence; Article 36).
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/aug2025/gr_259322_2025.html — Chan Tee Ten v. Tee Ten, G.R. No. 259322, August 6, 2025, MAIN decision (clear and convincing quantum reaffirmed).
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_265570_2025.html — People v. Akil, G.R. No. 265570, April 7, 2025, MAIN decision (police-initiated private questioning of a detainee and custodial confession).
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.pdf — A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, current Rules 128 §3, 130 §§21–22, 131 §1, 133 §§1–2,4–6.
  • https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html — 1987 Constitution, Article III §§2–3,12,14 (exclusionary protections and due process).

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.