Philippine Bar review · Topic

Clear and Convincing Evidence

Explore Clear and Convincing Evidence in Standards for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. How does Tan-Andal describe the clear-and-convincing standard relative to preponderance and proof beyond reasonable dou…
  2. Under Tan-Andal and its 2025 reaffirmation in Chan Tee Ten, what quantum must establish psychological incapacity under …
  3. Under People v. Akil, who bears the burden of establishing a valid waiver of constitutional rights before a custodial c…
  4. A spouse in an Article 36 case says a slightly heavier evidentiary balance necessarily suffices because all civil cases…
  5. A party argues that clear and convincing evidence necessarily means an expert must testify in every Article 36 case, re…
  6. Police assert that a detained suspect voluntarily waived custodial rights because he answered questions politely and di…
  7. In an Article 36 proceeding, the court has otherwise competent evidence and correctly identifies clear and convincing e…
  8. Explain the position of clear and convincing evidence among the principal standards of proof and identify a verified Ph…
  9. Explain the relationship between clear and convincing proof of a custodial waiver and the legal requirements for execut…
  10. Why does Tan-Andal's clear-and-convincing standard not establish a universal rule requiring expert testimony in Article…
  11. Under Olalia, who must make the required clear-and-convincing showing for the extradition-bail inquiry?
  12. What matters must the potential extraditee establish by the standard identified in Olalia?