Philippine Bar review · Topic
Positive and Negative Evidence
Explore Positive and Negative Evidence in Weight and Sufficiency (Rule 133) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which is an example of positive testimony about an occurrence?
- Which best illustrates negative testimony based on nonobservation?
- How should the general preference for credible positive testimony over a bare denial be understood?
- One credible witness clearly observes a delivery. Another, distracted in a different room, says only that no delivery w…
- An expert explains from reliable examination why the sequence of signature and typing cannot be determined. Another exp…
- A prosecution witness asserts a positive identification, but the record shows the witness could not see the offender an…
- In a documentary dispute, an expert's careful, source-supported analysis finds no scientifically defensible answer to t…
- Distinguish positive testimony from negative testimony based on nonobservation, and explain why the general preference …
- Explain the lesson of Gomez v. Gomez-Samson concerning a positive expert conclusion and an expert opinion that no relia…
- A prosecutor asks the court to convict because an eyewitness makes an affirmative accusation while the accused merely d…
- Does a witness’s failure to remember an event necessarily establish that the event never occurred?
- Is testimony I do not remember seeing the signing identical to testimony I continuously watched and no signing occurred?