Practice question
An investigator treats an excluded item as the sole foundation of one essential circumstance, then argues Gamon’s collective-assessment approach allows that unsupported link to be counted anyway. Which is correct?
- The collective label cures exclusion
- Collective evaluation does not dispense with legally established foundational facts
- Every excluded item becomes admissible when grouped
- Only the investigator’s conclusion matters
- One unsupported link automatically becomes direct evidence
Legal references
- A.M.19-08-15-SC, current Rules128,130 Sections1,21–22 and133 Sections1–5: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.pdf
- Gamon v. People, G.R.269730, July9,2025, MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/jul2025/gr_269730_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.