Philippine Bar review · Topic

Previous Conduct as Evidence

Page 2 of practice questions on Previous Conduct as Evidence in Testimonial Evidence. Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does Section36 expressly include an offer to deliver specific personal property?
  2. A company proves it did not omit a safety step on one earlier occasion and offers that fact solely to prove it could no…
  3. A written offer identifies a particular generator for delivery and is rejected without valid cause. Counsel argues Sect…
  4. A proponent supplies well-supported evidence of repeated conduct actually relevant to a disputed habit, but the court r…
  5. A qualifying rejected written offer has the Section36 effect of actual production and tender. The offeror argues this e…
  6. Explain why proof that a person did not do something on an earlier occasion is covered by Section35’s general rule.
  7. A written offer identifies specific personal property and is rejected without valid cause. Discuss Section36 without as…
  8. A court treats Section35 as an absolute ban on earlier conduct even when a properly supported habit purpose is establis…