Practice question
A proponent supplies well-supported evidence of repeated conduct actually relevant to a disputed habit, but the court rejects it solely because Section35 categorically forbids every reference to earlier conduct. Which is correct?
- The rule permits genuine habit-related use subject to admissibility and relevance
- All previous conduct is forbidden regardless of purpose
- A habit label automatically decides liability
- Only unfavorable prior acts are admissible
- The current burden of proof disappears
Legal references
- A.M.19-08-15-SC, current Rule130 Sections25–36,51–53 and Rule128 Sections3–4: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.