Practice question
The original’s exact disputed price clause is central to the case. Counsel offers a retelling and relies solely on Section3(e), asserting all paper originals are collateral. Which is correct?
- The stated controlling clause does not fit the claimed not-closely-related exception
- Every paper original is collateral automatically
- Section3(e) eliminates the rule in all contract cases
- Counsel’s label conclusively determines materiality
- The exact clause becomes irrelevant once a retelling exists
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, Rule130 Sections3–9: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.