Practice question
A party invokes adverse custody under Section6 after giving notice, but fails to supply satisfactory proof that the supposed document exists. It argues notice alone proves the remaining foundation. Which is correct?
- The existence requirement remains; notice does not itself establish it
- Notice conclusively proves any imagined document exists
- The opponent must create the document
- The court must accept every claimed term without proof
- Section6 abolishes all foundation beyond a demand
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, Rule130 Sections3–9: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.