Philippine Bar review · Topic
Proof vs. Evidence
Explore Proof vs. Evidence in General Provisions and Principles (Rule 128) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- In the distinction between evidence and proof, which best describes evidence?
- In this distinction, what does proof emphasize?
- Does admission of an exhibit necessarily mean the fact for which it was offered has been sufficiently proved?
- A witness's testimony is admitted, but the court finds it unreliable after evaluating the witness's opportunity to obse…
- A litigant submits many admitted exhibits but none addresses an essential disputed element of the claim. Does the large…
- In a collision damages case, photographs reliably show severe damage to the car. The claimant argues those photographs …
- In an ordinary civil dispute, one side presents one highly credible witness with direct knowledge; the other presents f…
- Distinguish evidence from proof and explain why admitted evidence may still be insufficient.
- Explain the evidence-versus-proof lesson illustrated by Dela Llana's treatment of photographs showing vehicle damage.
- Why do neither the number of witnesses nor the number of exhibits necessarily determine whether an ordinary civil claim…
- Can a properly received expert opinion still be assigned limited weight after the court evaluates its factual and metho…
- Does proof beyond reasonable doubt require absolute certainty excluding every possibility of error?