Practice question
A litigant possesses a machine but undisputed records establish that it was borrowed under a lease from another owner. He invokes the ordinary possession-ownership presumption as conclusive ownership. Which is correct?
- The established contrary basis of possession can rebut the disputable ownership inference
- Possession conclusively transfers title in every case
- A lease automatically becomes a sale without terms
- No evidence may explain possession
- Only the machine’s color determines ownership
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, current Rule130 Section54; Rule131 Sections1–3,5–6; Rule133 Section1: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.