Philippine Bar review · Topic
Relevance; Collateral Matters
Explore Relevance; Collateral Matters in Requisites (Rule 128, Secs. 3–4) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under Rule 128 section 4, what makes evidence relevant?
- How does section 4 treat evidence on collateral matters?
- Must an item conclusively prove the entire claim before it can be relevant?
- In a slip-and-fall case disputing whether a walkway was wet, a witness describes rain entering through a damaged roof i…
- In an ordinary dispute about whether goods were delivered on a specified date, a party offers the other party’s favorit…
- A document strongly supports a disputed factual issue but was obtained through a method subject to a valid constitution…
- A case turns on whether a machine was functioning at noon. A reliable test at 11:55, coupled with evidence that no inte…
- State the relevance test and the rule for collateral matters under Rule 128 section 4.
- Distinguish relevance, admissibility and sufficient proof of a claim.
- How should a court assess circumstantial evidence offered on a fact surrounding the principal disputed event?
- Can evidence be relevant because it makes the fact in issue less likely rather than more likely?
- Does calling a surrounding fact collateral automatically resolve its admissibility?