Philippine Bar review · Topic
Competency
Page 2 of practice questions on Competency in Requisites (Rule 128, Secs. 3–4). Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Section21 require all perception to occur through sight?
- A blind witness personally heard a relevant conversation and can accurately communicate the words heard. Does blindness…
- A deaf witness personally saw the relevant act and can communicate the observation through an effective interpreting ar…
- A witness belongs to an unpopular political group but personally observed the disputed event and can communicate it. Co…
- A witness was unconscious during the alleged transaction but can speak clearly at trial. The proponent offers the witne…
- Explain how the functional qualification test applies to a blind witness describing personally heard words.
- Distinguish exclusion solely for religious or political belief from evaluation of a witness’s actual knowledge.
- A person can communicate well but did not perceive the event. Explain why communication ability is not sufficient to au…