Philippine Bar review · Topic

Competency

Explore Competency in Requisites (Rule 128, Secs. 3–4) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. In the general admissibility inquiry, what does competency of evidence principally concern?
  2. What two conditions does Rule 128 section 3 state for admissibility?
  3. Under Rule 130 section 21, does a witness’s criminal conviction invariably disqualify that person from testifying?
  4. An offered statement is relevant but falls within the hearsay exclusion, and no applicable exception or other basis is …
  5. A witness can perceive and communicate the relevant observations but has an interest in the result. Does that interest …
  6. A document is authenticated as genuinely signed by its maker. Counsel then argues that authentication necessarily resol…
  7. An item is highly persuasive on a disputed issue, but the court finds that a valid constitutional exclusion applies and…
  8. Explain competency of evidence in relation to relevance and credibility.
  9. A witness has a financial interest in the result but can perceive and communicate the relevant observations. Explain qu…
  10. Why does authenticating a document not necessarily settle the admissibility of every statement in it?
  11. Does a witness’s religious belief alone disqualify the witness under Rule130 Section21?
  12. Does political belief alone make a witness legally disqualified under Section21?