Philippine Bar review · Topic
Competency
Explore Competency in Requisites (Rule 128, Secs. 3–4) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- In the general admissibility inquiry, what does competency of evidence principally concern?
- What two conditions does Rule 128 section 3 state for admissibility?
- Under Rule 130 section 21, does a witness’s criminal conviction invariably disqualify that person from testifying?
- An offered statement is relevant but falls within the hearsay exclusion, and no applicable exception or other basis is …
- A witness can perceive and communicate the relevant observations but has an interest in the result. Does that interest …
- A document is authenticated as genuinely signed by its maker. Counsel then argues that authentication necessarily resol…
- An item is highly persuasive on a disputed issue, but the court finds that a valid constitutional exclusion applies and…
- Explain competency of evidence in relation to relevance and credibility.
- A witness has a financial interest in the result but can perceive and communicate the relevant observations. Explain qu…
- Why does authenticating a document not necessarily settle the admissibility of every statement in it?
- Does a witness’s religious belief alone disqualify the witness under Rule130 Section21?
- Does political belief alone make a witness legally disqualified under Section21?