Practice question
A party offers negotiation correspondence to rebut an accusation that it deliberately delayed negotiations, not to establish liability on the claim. Must Section28’s liability exclusion automatically settle that different purpose?
- No; the specified alternative purpose must be assessed
- Yes; no alternative purpose can exist
- Yes; every negotiation word proves liability instead
- Only the correspondence’s length matters
- Only the writer’s job title matters
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, effectiveMay1,2020, Rules128 Sections3–4;129 Section4;130 Sections21–22,28,37;132 Sections34,39: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.