Philippine Bar review · Topic
Multiple Admissibility
Explore Multiple Admissibility in Admissibility for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What is the central idea of multiple admissibility?
- Why must an offer specify its evidentiary purpose under Rule 132 section 34?
- Which distinction separates multiple from conditional admissibility?
- A warning is offered to show that its listener had notice of a hazard, not to prove the warning’s factual assertion tru…
- A signed letter by A admits A’s debt. It also accuses unrelated B of wrongdoing. No agency, conspiracy or other basis i…
- A civil compromise-negotiation statement is offered solely to prove liability. The court rejects that use. Later a mate…
- In a disputed-identity case, the proponent offers a prior act only on the asserted specific identity issue and expressl…
- Explain multiple admissibility and its connection to the stated purpose of an offer.
- A statement is relevant to notice but is not admissible for the truth of its accusation. Explain the permissible analyt…
- Explain why a confession admissible against its maker is not automatically admissible against every co-accused.
- Can words offered to establish the making of a contractual offer, rather than the truth of a factual assertion, require…
- Under Rule130 Section28, may compromise-negotiation evidence be considered for a properly supported purpose of negativi…