Philippine Bar review · Topic

Multiple Admissibility

Explore Multiple Admissibility in Admissibility for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is the central idea of multiple admissibility?
  2. Why must an offer specify its evidentiary purpose under Rule 132 section 34?
  3. Which distinction separates multiple from conditional admissibility?
  4. A warning is offered to show that its listener had notice of a hazard, not to prove the warning’s factual assertion tru…
  5. A signed letter by A admits A’s debt. It also accuses unrelated B of wrongdoing. No agency, conspiracy or other basis i…
  6. A civil compromise-negotiation statement is offered solely to prove liability. The court rejects that use. Later a mate…
  7. In a disputed-identity case, the proponent offers a prior act only on the asserted specific identity issue and expressl…
  8. Explain multiple admissibility and its connection to the stated purpose of an offer.
  9. A statement is relevant to notice but is not admissible for the truth of its accusation. Explain the permissible analyt…
  10. Explain why a confession admissible against its maker is not automatically admissible against every co-accused.
  11. Can words offered to establish the making of a contractual offer, rather than the truth of a factual assertion, require…
  12. Under Rule130 Section28, may compromise-negotiation evidence be considered for a properly supported purpose of negativi…