Practice question
Distinguish the express completeness rule from a claim that every earlier evidentiary error permits unlimited counter-evidence.
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html — Rule 128 sections 3–4; Rule 132 sections 6–7, 17 and 39: limits on corrective reply, clarification, completeness and striking improper testimony.
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.