Philippine Bar review · Topic

Curative Admissibility

Explore Curative Admissibility in Admissibility for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What is the legitimate objective of a corrective evidentiary reply when prior evidence has created a misleading impress…
  2. When one party introduces part of a conversation, what does Rule 132 section 17 permit the other party to inquire into?
  3. Which is an express procedural response to incompetent, irrelevant or otherwise improper answers under Rule 132 section…
  4. Cross-examination leaves an answer appearing to admit that an invoice was unpaid, although the witness meant only that …
  5. One party reads a short paragraph from a letter. The opponent seeks to introduce the next paragraph that directly quali…
  6. A party claims that an improper statement admitted for the opponent entitles it to introduce a different item already f…
  7. A witness volunteers a nonresponsive prejudicial accusation before counsel can object. The adverse party asks to strike…
  8. Explain the purpose and limits of a corrective or curative reply to misleading evidence using the current Rules on Evid…
  9. Distinguish the express completeness rule from a claim that every earlier evidentiary error permits unlimited counter-e…
  10. A nonresponsive answer creates unfair prejudice. Explain the targeted remedies before seeking to respond with material …
  11. A party introduces a detached act of handing over money as if it were a gift. The opponent seeks to show the contempora…
  12. After cross-examination creates an incomplete account of a delivery, what does Rule 132, Section 7 permit on redirect?