Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Nonappearance at Pre-trial Conference

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

The accused was never notified of pre-trial. Both lawyers attend and invoke the guideline permitting absence after due notice. Is that particular notice predicate satisfied?
  1. Yes, both lawyers’ presence automatically proves notice to the accused.
  2. Yes, the rule expressly dispenses with notification.
  3. Yes, every accused is deemed notified by the filing of an information alone.
  4. No.
  5. Yes, the private complainant can waive the accused’s notice conclusively.

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rules 115-116 and 118-119, specifically the provisions discussed: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
  • A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC, April 25, 2017, Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases, Part III, items 8(b), 8(f) and 9 (primary text reproduced by WIPO Lex): https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/20516

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.