Philippine Bar review · Topic

Nonappearance at Pre-trial Conference

Explore Nonappearance at Pre-trial Conference in Pre-trial (Rule 118) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under Rule118 Section3, whose unexplained nonappearance is expressly addressed for sanctions?
  2. Does Section3 require consideration of an acceptable excuse?
  3. Under the continuous-trial Guidelines, can pre-trial proceed despite absence of an accused or private complainant who w…
  4. Defense counsel misses criminal pre-trial and supplies no acceptable excuse. Must the court automatically acquit the ac…
  5. The accused is absent but duly notified; defense counsel and the prosecutor attend. The prosecution asks to declare eve…
  6. A prosecutor is absent from pre-trial and later provides substantiated facts for the court to evaluate as an excuse. Th…
  7. Both lawyers are absent, but the judge cites the continuous-trial permission for an absent accused and proceeds as thou…
  8. Compare the nonappearance of counsel with the absence of a duly notified accused when both lawyers attend.
  9. Why does Rule118 Section3 not authorize automatic merits judgment for every failure to attend?
  10. Explain why conducting pre-trial in the accused’s permitted absence does not dispense with signature safeguards.
  11. The continuous-trial rule permits pre-trial despite an accused’s absence under stated conditions. Does that also author…
  12. Under Part III, item 8(b), is notice of arraignment and pre-trial limited to defense counsel alone?