Practice question
The accused misses a duly notified pre-trial attended by both lawyers. Counsel orally admits a disputed incriminating fact, with no writing signed by accused and counsel. Does permission to proceed remove Rule 118, Section 2’s safeguards?
- No.
- Yes, absence itself signs every admission.
- Yes, counsel’s attendance always eliminates the accused’s required signature.
- Yes, the judge may presume every element admitted.
- Yes, an unsigned proposed agreement is a guilty plea.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rules 115-116 and 118-119, specifically the provisions discussed: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
- A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC, April 25, 2017, Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases, Part III, items 8(b), 8(f) and 9 (primary text reproduced by WIPO Lex): https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/20516
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.