Practice question
Explain the findings required in a judgment of acquittal under Rule 120, Section 2, and why failure of proof beyond reasonable doubt should not automatically be described as a finding that the underlying act never existed.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule 120, Sections 1–2.
- Reviewed primary authority, Rule 120, Sections 1–2: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.