Philippine Bar review · Topic
Requisites of a Valid Judgment
Explore Requisites of a Valid Judgment in Judgment (Rule 120) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Which describes the required form of a criminal judgment under Rule 120, Section 1?
- Which must a judgment of conviction state under Rule 120, Section 2?
- What distinction must a judgment of acquittal state under Rule 120, Section 2?
- A criminal court merely announces 'guilty' orally, without preparing or signing a written judgment. Does this satisfy R…
- A judgment convicts an accused but does not state whether the accused participated as principal, accomplice or accessor…
- A judge signs a paper stating only the offense name and sentence. It contains no account of the facts or law supporting…
- A judgment acquits because guilt was not proved beyond reasonable doubt but says nothing about whether the act or omiss…
- State the definition and required form of judgment in a criminal case under Rule 120, Section 1.
- Enumerate the required contents of a judgment of conviction under Rule 120, Section 2, including the provision's qualif…
- Explain the findings required in a judgment of acquittal under Rule 120, Section 2, and why failure of proof beyond rea…
- Under Rule120 Section2, must a conviction identify the aggravating or mitigating circumstances attending commission?
- Is a civil-damages award invariably required in every criminal conviction regardless of a valid separate-action reserva…