Philippine Bar review · Topic
Bail-Negating Circumstances
Page 2 of practice questions on Bail-Negating Circumstances in Bail (Rule 114). Browse published questions and explore related topics for Philippine Bar review.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Section 5(b) qualify its reference to prior bail-condition violations?
- The RTC imposed exactly six years, not more than six. Does that amount alone trigger Section 5’s paragraph beginning wi…
- In the applicable exceeding-six-year setting, the prosecution proves with notice that the offense was committed during …
- The prosecution invokes Section 5(e) but argues that requesting an appeal is itself proof of undue risk of another crim…
- The prosecution relies on a missed bail appearance but the accused presents a documented potentially valid justificatio…
- Compare an imposed sentence of exactly six years with one exceeding six for the listed Section 5 circumstances.
- The prosecution alleges an earlier bail violation after a qualifying RTC conviction. The accused offers a documented ex…
- Explain the difference between an undue risk of another crime pending appeal and an objection merely to the accused’s f…