Philippine Bar review · Topic

Bail-Negating Circumstances

Explore Bail-Negating Circumstances in Bail (Rule 114) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. In Rule114 Section5’s specified post-RTC-conviction setting, what imposed imprisonment triggers its listed bail-negatin…
  2. Who must make the Section5 showing of a listed or similar bail-negating circumstance, with notice to the accused?
  3. Which is expressly a bail-negating circumstance in the stated Section5 setting?
  4. After RTC conviction and an imposed sentence exceeding six years in Section5’s setting, the prosecution establishes, wi…
  5. No listed bail-negating circumstance is proved after an RTC sentence exceeding six years. Does that alone make postconv…
  6. A convicted appellant argues that advanced age and an alleged absence of flight conclusively require bail because no li…
  7. The prosecution alleges prior unjustified escape in a case within Section5’s exceeding-six-year setting, but supplies n…
  8. Explain the relation between listed bail-negating circumstances and discretion after RTC conviction.
  9. Why are notice and a prosecutorial showing necessary before invoking Section5’s mandatory consequence?
  10. An appellant says lack of listed circumstances is the same as entitlement to bail. Analyze.
  11. In Section 5’s applicable exceeding-six-year post-RTC-conviction setting, which status at commission of the offense is …
  12. Which prospective risk is expressly identified in Section 5(e) for bail pending appeal?