Philippine Bar review · Topic
Bail-Negating Circumstances
Explore Bail-Negating Circumstances in Bail (Rule 114) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- In Rule114 Section5’s specified post-RTC-conviction setting, what imposed imprisonment triggers its listed bail-negatin…
- Who must make the Section5 showing of a listed or similar bail-negating circumstance, with notice to the accused?
- Which is expressly a bail-negating circumstance in the stated Section5 setting?
- After RTC conviction and an imposed sentence exceeding six years in Section5’s setting, the prosecution establishes, wi…
- No listed bail-negating circumstance is proved after an RTC sentence exceeding six years. Does that alone make postconv…
- A convicted appellant argues that advanced age and an alleged absence of flight conclusively require bail because no li…
- The prosecution alleges prior unjustified escape in a case within Section5’s exceeding-six-year setting, but supplies n…
- Explain the relation between listed bail-negating circumstances and discretion after RTC conviction.
- Why are notice and a prosecutorial showing necessary before invoking Section5’s mandatory consequence?
- An appellant says lack of listed circumstances is the same as entitlement to bail. Analyze.
- In Section 5’s applicable exceeding-six-year post-RTC-conviction setting, which status at commission of the offense is …
- Which prospective risk is expressly identified in Section 5(e) for bail pending appeal?