Practice question
A sixteen-year-old pleads guilty to a noncapital offense. The prosecution offers no separate proof of discernment, relying only on the plea. Under Singh, is that enough to dispense with the required proof?
- No; the plea does not remove the separate discernment requirement
- Yes; every sixteen-year-old necessarily acts with discernment
- Yes; a plea conclusively proves the requirement
- Yes; discernment applies only after imprisonment
- Yes; a noncapital charge excludes juvenile protections
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule116 Sections1,3–9: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
- People v Singh, GR270284, April14,2026, MAIN opinion, Rule116 Section4 and separate proof of discernment for children: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70538
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.