Philippine Bar review · Topic
Noncapital Offense
Explore Noncapital Offense in Guilty Plea for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- When the accused pleads guilty to a noncapital offense, what does Rule 116, Section 4 provide regarding reception of ev…
- What happens under Rule 116, Section 1(d) when an accused pleads guilty but presents exculpatory evidence?
- Up to what stage may the court permit withdrawal of an improvident guilty plea under Rule 116, Section 5?
- An accused validly pleads guilty to a noncapital offense. The judge decides to receive evidence from both parties to de…
- Before conviction becomes final, an accused shows that a guilty plea was improvidently made and asks to replace it with…
- After pleading guilty to a noncapital charge, the accused offers evidence that, if accepted, exculpates the accused rat…
- An accused enters an improvident guilty plea to a noncapital offense. A conviction is rendered but is not yet final. Th…
- Explain reception of evidence after a guilty plea to a noncapital offense under Rule 116, Section 4. Distinguish this f…
- Discuss withdrawal of an improvident guilty plea under Rule 116, Section 5, including the applicable cutoff and the ple…
- In a noncapital prosecution, the accused pleads guilty but then produces evidence denying criminal responsibility. Expl…
- Under People v Singh, does a child’s guilty plea to a noncapital offense eliminate the separate requirement to prove di…
- What standard did Singh require for the separate proof of a child’s discernment?